Our guest commentator on Horiwood.Com today, Ben Mezrich says, clearly… Yes! Zuckerberg is running with a lot of others thunder if he’s claiming the “Facebook Creator” title.
Read it here:
In “Accidental Billionaires — The Founding of Facebook: A Tale of Sex, Money, Genius and Betrayal,” Mezrich, a 1991 Harvard grad, traces the company’s progress from its 2004 origins in a beer-soaked dorm room to the worldwide phenomenon it has become. The book, which is labeled non-fiction and has already been optioned for a movie, uses some of the same controversial literary techniques Mezrich deployed in “Bringing Down the House,” including re-created dialogue, imagined details, and compressed conversations. He talked with TIME about his controversial methods, why he considers himself a journalist, and how Facebook is permanently shaping our lives — whether we like it or not.
One thing you don’t really get into in the book is how you came upon the story and why you chose to write about it. Can you tell me how you got to know Eduardo?
I got an email at two in the morning one night from a guy named Will McMullen, who was a senior at Harvard [when Facebook was founded]. He was just shooting an e-mail out to me saying one of his good friends co-founded Facebook, and would I be interested in the story?
I was immediately intrigued. I met the kid for a drink and he showed up with this geeky, gawky kid who ended up being Eduardo. Eduardo and Mark [Zuckerberg] had been best friends before their friendship fell apart, and I thought there was a pretty cool drama in that.
(Read “Is Your Facebook Account a Gold Mine for Identity Thieves?”)
And you weren’t able to get Mark to speak with you for the book?
No, Mark opted not to talk to me. You know, he was nervous. I think Facebook as a whole was kind of terrified about what I might write. It takes place in his sophomore year, and there’s a lot of semi-scandalous stuff in the book. In truth, I’m a big fan of Mark. But this is a story they didn’t want told.
As you write in your author’s note, you’ve re-created dialogue, changed or imagined details, and compressed conversations. Why did you decide to use those techniques?
My style is this sort of immersion journalism, where I go inside the story and built it as a thriller, as a narrative. There are a lot of journalists who don’t get what I do. They don’t understand my style or they’re frustrated by it. And sometimes they’re quite angry about it, which is funny. I re-create the story. It’s a true story. It’s non-fiction.
But in certain scenes, and certain instances, I have multiple sources and many pages of documentation — like thousands of pages of court documents. [While] creating the scene from those documents and from opposing views of what actually happened, I have to choose what I believe really happened. And I’m very clear about that. When I get into a scene that I know I’m working off of documents or a lot of different opinions, I say “This is what probably happened.” My audience understands what I do and likes the way I write these narratives. I think as a whole, this book is non-fiction. I don’t think anybody could look at it and say differently.
Do you consider yourself a journalist?
I mean, in a way. I’m a different sort of journalist than someone who writes a textbook, or someone who writes a documentary. I write a form of journalism that I think a few people are doing. Go back to Michael Lewis, or Sebastian Junger, or all the way back to Hunter S. Thompson. I think I see myself as that sort of journalist — someone’s who telling a true story, but in an entertaining way.
Did finding out what really happened change your perception of Mark Zuckerberg in any way?
I don’t really have an opinion [on the book's events]. I lay it out there and I couldn’t tell you whether or not Mark stole [the idea for Facebook] or not. I feel like there was definitely a reason for each one to have the view that they had. My opinion of Mark hasn’t really changed. I think he’s a genius. I think he started this massive company that’s amazing. But I also think that socially, he’s very unaware.
Was it hard to track down these characters to get the real story?
The way I write my books and my stories is I really just go in there as someone who’s just having a great time with them. It’s not me with a notepad running around trying to get an interview. It’s me hanging out with people who love “Bringing Down the House,” who want to talk about Vegas and want to go to Vegas, that kind of thing. It’s a very different form of journalism, I think.
How do you see Facebook evolving as a business?
I honestly think we’re just at the beginning of Facebook. Facebook is growing enormously. It’s 200 million users and growing. I see no reason why it doesn’t have a billion users in a couple years. And I really think it’s going to become a lifestyle. In terms of revenue, they’re growing and they’re going to find a way to make real money. If everyone who’s on Facebook paid a dollar a month for the service, they’d be one of the most profitable companies in the world. The more I’ve read about it and gotten inside of it, I think this is something that can be very life-changing. And the future will look differently because of Facebook.
Food for thawt huh! And there’s a principle in the book of Proverbs that one must give honor to whom honor is due. Thanks Ben Mezrich for setting Facebook’s authorship record straight. A nice interview! [photo by Lynn Goldsmith, Corbis]

1 comment
Comments feed for this article
July 15, 2009 at 9:56 pm
10 HOT POSTS RIGHT NOW 7.15.09 « Horiwood’s Blog
[...] 6. GUEST COMMENTARY: IS MARK ZUCKERBERG A GLORY HOG REGARDING FACE BOOK’S AUTHORSHIP [...]